Qualification
Initial project check
A concise intake to identify project fit, missing information and the appropriate paid next step.
No detailed design or financial analysisPaid feasibility & project qualification
Clarity before capital.
A greenhouse proposal is meaningful only when the crop, climate, market, water, operation and investment logic belong together. Our phased process protects both the client and the project.
€7,500 · advance payment
Initial fact finding
Climate, water, market, crop, location and initial system direction, including the principal risks and information gaps.
Defined engagement and decision noteFrom €5,000 · advance payment
Market validation
Buyer segments, volume, quality specifications, seasonal pricing, competing supply, packaging and practical route to market.
Optional or integrated study moduleFrom €15,000 · advance payment
Pre-feasibility study
Production concept, technical configuration, CAPEX structure, OPEX, yield scenarios, market logic, cash flow and risk analysis.
Commercial and technical decision basisFrom €7,500 · advance payment
Investment-ready preparation
Investor memorandum, project scope, development phasing, financing need and preparation for qualified investment discussions.
For projects with verified fundamentalsCommercial principle
Published amounts are starting fees excluding VAT. Professional analysis, engineering preparation and development work begin only after written acceptance and advance payment. Travel, laboratory work and third-party studies are charged separately when required.
What feasibility must prove
A report is useful only when it changes a decision.
The first task is to define the opportunity accurately: location, sponsor, land position, water source, intended market, crop direction, preferred scale and available capital. Missing information is not hidden; it becomes an action, assumption or stop condition.
Technical feasibility connects historic climate data with crop requirements and available systems. It establishes the greenhouse family, ventilation and climate direction, irrigation and water strategy, growing method, service building, utilities, packing and implementation sequence.
Commercial feasibility converts the concept into production and cash-flow scenarios. It tests marketable output, realistic sales prices, labour, energy, water, packaging, logistics, maintenance, crop inputs, finance and working capital. Downside scenarios show which assumptions can break the project.
The outcome may be proceed, revise, phase or stop. A negative conclusion is still valuable when it prevents a much larger capital loss. A positive conclusion should create a defined basis for engineering, investor discussion and project development.
Project qualification
Start with enough information to make the next decision useful.
The structured intake records the opportunity for initial qualification. Suitable projects receive a proposed paid route, scope and advance-payment requirement.